Domino Effect for the US
Deciphering the online casino gambling situation in the Untied States is a tough feat for even the most up-to-date of analysts, but predicting the outcome of all of the intense political debate about the situation is even more difficult. Right now, the US is a combination of contradictory and questionable laws related to internet gambling and in some cases, the enforcement officials are attempting to use extremely out-dated laws as a scapegoat for enforcing their will on the US public. The 1960s era Wire Act has no direct connection to the current world of internet transactions and online casinos – the law was conceived at a time when the internet was unfathomable and yet the US Department of Justice has attempted to use the Wire Act to help justify banning and blocking the internet gambling industry.
The Wire Act is outdated and the UIGEA is highly flawed, yet at the same time, that’s pretty much all the state and federal governments have to consider when legislating and regulating the online casino gambling industry. In the past year that individual state governments have taken a bold and definite step toward helping the US federal government come to a clear decision on the internet gambling industry. Several US states have begun to regulate and license internet betting as a first port of entry into the lucrative internet gambling industry.
The state governments are clearly indicating that they would like the online casino gambling policies and legislation in the US – even if that means passing regulations that only apply within state borders. These developments at the state level are a new consideration for the US government when the internet gambling issue finds its way to the floor of Congress for discussion.